![circumplast feedback.jpg](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/55277bb1e4b0e6a7fd13d216/1450307121696-KNVTK6TXSD43B4ERUF7I/circumplast+feedback.jpg)
Feedback
Paediatric Surgeons, Urologists and GP specialsit in circumcision have given their views of Circumplast Circumcision in male children.
"I have been using Plastibell for the last 20 years; I always think there are serious complications associated with Plastibell which could be prevented by changing the design. Circumplast devices have eliminated any risks involved with the proximal migration of the device due to the cylindrical design. The glans of the penis are kept completely covered by the device, which could prevent meatal stenosis in the future. Circumplasts are unique in their ability to allow for multiple locations in which the surgeon may secure the ligature, which was not possible in the case of Plastibell. The proximal tip of the device helps to cut the inner mucosal skin very close to the coronal sulcus. This also prevents future adhesion of the inner mucosal skin to the glans of the penis and gives a better cosmetic appearance. Due to these reasons, I have been using the Circumpilast device for the last 5 years with excellent results." ARK (Paediatric Urologist, London, UK)
“Circumplast has minimum risk of migrating to shaft of the penis as compare to the Plastibell device in newborn circumcision ”